<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Family Violence Cases in Alberta: A Snapshot</title>
	<link>http://ablawg.ca/2008/09/22/family-violence-cases-in-alberta-a-snapshot/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ABlawg.ca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Clarification of Evidentiary Requirements under the Protection Against Family Violence Act</title>
		<link>http://ablawg.ca/2008/09/22/family-violence-cases-in-alberta-a-snapshot/#comment-69292</link>
		<dc:creator>ABlawg.ca &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Clarification of Evidentiary Requirements under the Protection Against Family Violence Act</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ablawg.ca/2008/09/22/family-violence-cases-in-alberta-a-snapshot/#comment-69292</guid>
		<description>[...] under the Protection Against Family Violence Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. P-27 (PAFVA) (see my earlier post Family Violence Cases in Alberta: A Snapshot). In one of his recent decisions, Justice Lee helpfully clarifies the evidentiary requirements for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] under the Protection Against Family Violence Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. P-27 (PAFVA) (see my earlier post Family Violence Cases in Alberta: A Snapshot). In one of his recent decisions, Justice Lee helpfully clarifies the evidentiary requirements for [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

