<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The perils of selling the same property twice (with an aside on styles of appellate decision-making)</title>
	<link>http://ablawg.ca/2009/06/09/the-perils-of-selling-the-same-property-twice-with-an-aside-on-styles-of-appellate-decision-making/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonnette Watson Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://ablawg.ca/2009/06/09/the-perils-of-selling-the-same-property-twice-with-an-aside-on-styles-of-appellate-decision-making/#comment-81485</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonnette Watson Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ablawg.ca/2009/06/09/the-perils-of-selling-the-same-property-twice-with-an-aside-on-styles-of-appellate-decision-making/#comment-81485</guid>
		<description>Castledowns' application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was dismissed, with costs, on January 28, 2010. That is not surprising. The matter was one of contract interpretation and turned on the specific wording in the parties' documents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Castledowns&#8217; application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was dismissed, with costs, on January 28, 2010. That is not surprising. The matter was one of contract interpretation and turned on the specific wording in the parties&#8217; documents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

